F. Tiafoe
To Win
TBD
To Win
Frances Tiafoe vs Jeremy Chardy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L W L L
Form
W L L L W L L L L LH2H: Tiafoe 2 - 1 Chardy
They have played 6 sets in total, with Tiafoe winning 3 and Chardy winning 3. The last match between Tiafoe and Chardy was at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, 20-08-2019, Second, Hard with Frances Tiafoe getting the victory 4-2 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | 2 |
| Jeremy Chardy | 1 |
Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem(20-08-2019)
Upcoming Match
Tiafoe VS TBD
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 ret. |
Stats 
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Jeremy Chardy
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
18
Total Points Won
11
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frances Tiafoe
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Jeremy Chardy
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
127)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 29 | Games Won | 29 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 25 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:22:51 | Average Match Time | 1:22:51 |
| 68% (124/182) | 1st Serve % | 64% (134/211) |
| 69% (86/124) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (98/134) |
| 50% (29/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (29/77) |
| 25% (7/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (7/19) |
| 40% (84/211) | Return Points Win % | 37% (67/182) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Frances Tiafoe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Frances Tiafoe
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Frances Tiafoe
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
57%
(
62 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Frances Tiafoe
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Alex Michelsen
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Adam Walton
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Frances Tiafoe
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
79 of
142)
21
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
60 of
142)
128
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(11) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Frances Tiafoe
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
16
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (389/275) | Win/Loss | 54% (494/426) |
| 56% (977/766) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (1192/1104) |
| 51% (8885/8416) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11514/11225) |
| 59% (184/130) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (152/146) |
| 62% (118/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (210/162) |
| 52% (56/52) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (90/80) |
| 58% (31/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (42/38) |
| 0.49 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 4174 | Aces Total | 5879 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1497 | Total Double Faults | 2992 |
| 1:41:1 | Average Match Time | 1:6:5 |
| 342.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.3 |
| 61% (30107/49712) | 1st Serve % | 60% (34586/57422) |
| 72% (21816/30107) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (25688/34586) |
| 52% (10136/19602) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (11346/22829) |
| 38% (1625/4244) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1788/4647) |
| 36% (18266/50084) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20386/57044) |
| 59% (55/39) | Slam W/L | 48% (56/61) |
| 51% (58/56) | Masters W/L | 48% (85/92) |
| 25% (4/12) | Cups W/L | 70% (7/3) |
| 54% (127/110) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (191/169) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (98/43) | Challenger W/L | 60% (123/83) |
| 77% (46/14) | Futures W/L | 63% (29/17) |
| 59% (330/561) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (432/795) |
| 55% (53/96) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (57/116) |
| 56% (200/355) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (208/425) |
| 53% (145/272) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (165/297) |
| 80% (371/296) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (458/393) |
| 20% (371/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (458/64) |
| 31% (293/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (460/99) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
